News

Sudan Crisis: Military Offensive Sparks Deadly Clashes

Amid Growing Cholera Outbreak


(Source: Photo source: AA News Broadcasting System)
(Source: Ground News)
Global Strategic Communications - Sudan faces a dual crisis as fierce military clashes in Khartoum intensify alongside a worsening cholera outbreak. Discover the latest updates on the escalating violence, humanitarian concerns, and potential regional impacts.

Overview:
Sudan's capital, Khartoum, is once again engulfed in fierce fighting, as the military launched one of its largest offensives yet against the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). This dramatic escalation comes amid an alarming cholera outbreak, compounding the crisis in a country already reeling from a 17-month-long conflict. Reports suggest tens of thousands have died, with estimates climbing as high as 150,000. Meanwhile, the humanitarian situation continues to deteriorate, with the UN and international community urging for a resolution to the chaos. It’s a bleak and chaotic landscape, with no easy end in sight.
Sudan is grappling with a brutal cocktail of violence and disease as the military pushes to reclaim ground from the RSF (Rapid Support Forces) in Khartoum. What makes this latest surge in fighting especially dire is the backdrop: a cholera outbreak is spiraling out of control. The country, already devastated by civil conflict, now faces the double threat of bullets and bacteria. The humanitarian crisis worsens daily, with more deaths, limited aid, and an overwhelmed health system. It’s a grim reminder that when it rains, it pours—war and disease don’t respect borders.
What we’re witnessing is the classic “double trouble” in a conflict zone, where the usual horror show of military clashes gets a miserable encore with a health catastrophe. Both warring sides are locked in an exhausting stalemate, and civilians, caught in the crossfire, face the bleak reality of war not only outside their doors but also potentially in their water supplies.
This combination makes the Sudan crisis one of the most complex to resolve right now. International actors call for ceasefires, but the on-ground reality is tangled in power struggles. The cholera outbreak, a cruel side effect of war’s breakdown of infrastructure, serves as a reminder that without peace, no humanitarian aid can reach the people who need it most. Will international pressure, already slow-moving, find the momentum to push a resolution, or will Khartoum and the rest of Sudan remain in this deadly status quo?
Fingers crossed—but for now, it looks like the only thing surging is the misery.
Analysis: Sudan Conflict & Cholera Outbreak
1. Conflict Dynamics:
The Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) and Rapid Support Forces (RSF) continue their drawn-out battle over control of Khartoum. The fighting has extended to other regions, with 150,000 fatalities estimated so far.
The SAF launched its largest offensive, signaling a potential turning point or deeper entrenchment in the conflict. Both sides are heavily armed and have significant territorial control, making the military stalemate more entrenched.

2. Health Crisis—Cholera Outbreak:
The cholera outbreak is expanding due to broken infrastructure, limited access to clean water, and the destruction of healthcare systems in war zones.
Cholera thrives in war-torn areas where sanitation services collapse, and displaced populations cluster in unsanitary conditions. Current estimates put the outbreak at thousands of cases, with the potential for tens of thousands more as the situation worsens.
3. Humanitarian Impact:
Over 5.6 million people are internally displaced, with at least 24 million needing urgent humanitarian assistance. International aid remains limited due to unsafe conditions and bureaucratic hurdles.
Disease surveillance systems are largely non-functional, increasing the risk of unreported cholera cases spreading. Limited international involvement exacerbates the inability to control the outbreak.

4. Economic Toll:
The conflict has crippled Sudan’s economy, with major disruptions in oil production, agriculture, and trade. The inflation rate is skyrocketing, and key industries remain frozen. Access to basic goods, including food and medicine, is limited, worsening civilian conditions.
Risk Assessment:
1. Conflict Escalation Risk—High:
With both SAF and RSF locked in a battle for control, the conflict could escalate further, especially as foreign powers become more involved. External actors could prolong the war by providing weapons and resources, worsening conditions for civilians.

2. Humanitarian Catastrophe Risk—Severe:
The combination of civil war, displacement, and the cholera outbreak increases the probability of a humanitarian catastrophe. Lack of clean water, food shortages, and limited healthcare heighten the vulnerability of millions.
3. Regional Spillover Risk—Moderate:
Neighboring countries like Chad and South Sudan could experience increased refugee flows, border tensions, and potential disease outbreaks. Regional actors may intervene militarily or diplomatically, though most seem reluctant at this point.

4. Cholera Outbreak Worsening—Severe:
The cholera outbreak could become uncontrollable without intervention, potentially spreading across borders and affecting other nations. In densely populated camps, the disease could spread exponentially.
Analysis: Sexual Violence & Humanitarian Crisis in Sudan
1. Increase in Gender-Based Violence:
The U.N. Women report shows that gender-based violence has more than doubled since April 2023. Most cases involve women and girls, with sexual violence used as a tool to disrupt communities and exacerbate trauma.
5.8 million women are displaced, and many are at heightened risk, especially due to underreporting caused by stigma and a lack of safe reporting mechanisms.

2. Humanitarian Toll on Women and Girls:
Sudan's conflict has displaced over 10.8 million people, with 26 million facing acute hunger. Women-headed households are disproportionately affected by food insecurity, with 64% suffering compared to 48% of male-headed households.
Health services are in collapse, with 70%-80% of hospitals non-operational, severely impacting maternal and reproductive care. Women are dying from childbirth-related complications due to the lack of healthcare access.
3. Weaponization of Sexual Violence:
Sexual violence is systematically used to tear the social fabric of communities. Targeting the most vulnerable, this tactic inflicts long-lasting trauma on entire populations and is a violation of human rights.
The risk of exploitation is increasing in conflict zones such as Khartoum, Darfur, and Kordofan, where resources and protection are scarce.
Risk Assessment:
1. Continued Weaponization of Sexual Violence—Severe:
The use of sexual violence as a weapon could increase, especially in areas with limited law enforcement. The breakdown of order makes this tactic even more prevalent, with little deterrence in place.

2. Humanitarian Crisis Worsening—Critical:
Women and children face disproportionate suffering. The already catastrophic situation in Sudan is likely to worsen, with food insecurity, water scarcity, and healthcare breakdown further pushing vulnerable groups to the brink.
3. Regional Instability and Refugee Crisis—High:
The displacement crisis in Sudan, which affects over 12.8 million people, poses significant risks to neighboring countries. The influx of refugees could strain resources and exacerbate tensions across borders, spreading the impact of gender-based violence regionally.

4. Accountability Challenges—High:
Lack of accountability for perpetrators of sexual violence will likely remain a major barrier to justice. Without international pressure and intervention, holding those responsible accountable remains elusive, and the risk of impunity is high.
3. Regional Instability and Refugee Crisis—High:
The displacement crisis in Sudan, which affects over 12.8 million people, poses significant risks to neighboring countries. The influx of refugees could strain resources and exacerbate tensions across borders, spreading the impact of gender-based violence regionally.

4. Accountability Challenges—High:
Lack of accountability for perpetrators of sexual violence will likely remain a major barrier to justice. Without international pressure and intervention, holding those responsible accountable remains elusive, and the risk of impunity is high.
Final Assessment:
Sudan faces a precarious mix of escalating conflict and a severe public health crisis. The risk of further conflict and humanitarian catastrophe is high without immediate international intervention. Monitoring both the conflict’s trajectory and the spread of cholera will be critical in the coming months. Recommendations would include prioritizing ceasefire negotiations, securing humanitarian corridors, and focusing on containing the cholera outbreak to prevent further regional destabilization.

Sudan’s conflict continues to devastate communities, with sexual violence intensifying the suffering of women and girls. This violence, combined with deteriorating humanitarian conditions, is creating one of the worst global crises today. Immediate international intervention is necessary to provide protection, hold perpetrators accountable, and address the long-term needs of affected populations. Without such action, the future for Sudan’s women and girls remains perilous.
____________________________________________________
Sources:

Ground News. (2023, September 28). Sudan military offensive sparks new fighting in Khartoum as cholera outbreak worsens. Ground News. https://ground.news/article/sudan-military-offensive-sparks-new-fighting-in-khartoum-as-cholera-outbreak-worsens_2f466a

Voice of America. (2024, September 28). Sexual violence used as weapon of war throughout conflict in Sudan. VOA News. https://www.voanews.com/a/sexual-violence-used-as-weapon-of-war-throughout-conflict-in-sudan/7802951.html

Anadolu Agency. (2024, September 26). Sudan's army wages major offensive on paramilitary RSF in Khartoum. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/africa/sudan-s-army-wages-major-offensive-on-paramilitary-rsf-in-khartoum/3342360
Liability for this article lies with the author, who also holds the copyright. Editorial content from USPA may be quoted on other websites as long as the quote comprises no more than 5% of the entire text, is marked as such and the source is named (via hyperlink).